If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255).
Prosecutors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial are coming across as “tone deaf” to how jurors likely feel about the case, a criminal defense attorney says.
Lindsay Clancy, 36, faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children — Cora, Dawson and Callan, all under the age of 6 — who were found strangled at the family’s Duxbury, Massachusetts home in 2023. Prosecutors concluded their case Monday morning, and Clancy’s defense attorney has since begun presenting arguments, asserting that she was in the grip of postpartum psychosis when she killed her children.
Donna Rotunno, a criminal defense attorney, told Fox News Digital she feels that prosecutors are being “tone deaf” to the way jurors are feeling about the murder trial, citing specific examples.
One of the main examples Rotunno cited was a moment from Tuesday, when Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham asked Susan Clancy, Lindsay’s mother-in-law and a Catholic, if she knew murder was a “mortal sin.”
Susan Clancy offered no response to the question, prompting Judge William Sullivan to immediately call a sidebar and order the remark stricken from the record.
Rotunnno said the prosecution has so far come across as “uncaring and snarky.”
“I understand that your job is to prosecute this murder case and you view this as a first-degree murder,” Rotunno said, “but in sort of ignoring the true emotion that this type of a case invokes, and by ignoring it, you are really tone deaf as to the way the jurors feel.”
WATCH:
Rotunno also pointed to the testimony of Lindsay Clancy’s grandparents, particularly her mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, as a pivotal moment for the jury. She noted that Susan Clancy appeared deeply sympathetic to what Lindsay Clancy was going through. If the individual with the most reason to grieve the children’s deaths is standing behind Lindsay Clancy, Rotunno argued jurors will find it hard to see her as a cold-hearted murderer.
Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, asked Dr. Paul Zeizel, a clinical forensic psychologist, about the numerous times the mother reached out for help, and was turned away.
“She felt that her brain was damaged. She felt that she should kill herself. And she’s never going to get any better,” Zeizel said on Wednesday, explaining why Lindsay Clancy felt she needed to get help.
However, when Lindsay Clancy sought help in the form of a suicide hotline in December 2022, she was turned away, according to Zeizel.
WHEN IS A MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS TOO SEVERE FOR TELEHEALTH? WARNING SIGNS FAMILIES SHOULDN’T IGNORE
“She called the suicide hotline, Zeizel said.
“Did she receive any help from the suicide hotline?” Reddington asked.
“She did not,” Zeizel said, explaining that “They told us she did not meet the standard of care because she did not have a plan.”
She called the suicide hotline again, and according to Zeizel, didn’t receive help.
LINDSAY CLANCY DEFENSE SCORES ‘EXTREMELY HELPFUL’ PSYCHOSIS CONCESSION AS EXPERT FLAGS NEXT HURDLE
WATCH THE TESTIMONY:
When asked by Reddington, Zeizel also said that Lindsay Clancy thinks about her kids constantly and “misses them.”
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
“And when you speak with her and meet with her doctor, has she ever mentioned her children? Because apparently, according to the questioning that you underwent, she never talks about her kids,” Reddington said.
“She does speak about her children,” Zeizel said. “She really loves them and misses them and thinks of them every single day. Almost every moment of the day.”
WATCH:
SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS
Also on Wednesday, Judge William Sullivan rejected a defense motion seeking to add Emily Thorndike, a former clinical social worker at McLean Hospital, to the witness list. The defense contended that Thorndike’s firsthand experience in the same short-term unit where Clancy received treatment could counter what it characterized as a misleading portrayal of the facility as a “five star” hospital offering unlimited treatment options that Clancy chose to decline.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE
“Her involvement in this case came about after one of the prosecutors — I don’t recall which — made it out on direct examination that McLean is some kind of a five-star institution where the doctors, the psychiatrists, the psychotherapists, and the counselors were all banging into each other in the hallway trying to interview Miss Clancy, who was just blithely refusing care and treatment, which is not the case,” Reddington said previously.
Sullivan didn’t allow her to testify in front of jurors, but did allow a request from Reddington to include certain records relating to McClain’s staffing when Lindsay Clancy was there, and programs it offers.
The defense will continue arguments on Thursday, as a group of people plan to support Lindsay Clancy outside the Plymouth County Superior Court by wearing pink. People who can’t attend are encouraged to organize a gathering in their city on Thursday morning, according to posts on social media.
LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST
Reddington told Fox News on Wednesday that closing arguments will be on Monday, and didn’t say if he’s made a decision on if Lindsay Clancy will testify.
He said Lindsay Clancy is aware of the support she’s getting when asked about the solidarity gatherings in her support, with people wearing pink.
Fox News’ Bryan Llenas contributed to this report.
