If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255).
Prosecutors appeared to begin chipping away at the defense’s portrayal of Lindsay Clancy as overmedicated, walking jurors through nine prescription bottles that still contained many of the pills she had been given.
Patrick Clancy testified Monday that his ex-wife had been prescribed numerous psychiatric medications in the months before the deaths of their three young children. But under questioning from Assistant District Attorney Shanan Buckingham, he acknowledged that several prescriptions had only been partly used.
“So there were a lot of pills prescribed, but not a lot of pills taken. Correct?” Buckingham asked, holding up a bag of prescription medications.
“Is that comprehensive?” Patrick responded. “Of all the pills that were prescribed?”
“These are the pills that you brought into the police station,” Buckingham said. “So out of these.”
“Out of those, yeah,” Patrick said. “It’s possible that not a lot were taken.”
Buckingham also sought to distinguish between the total number of medications prescribed over several months and how many Lindsay was prescribed at one time.
Patrick estimated that she was taking three or four medications at most. Buckingham then asked whether it would surprise him to learn that Lindsay was prescribed no more than three medications at any given time and usually two.
LINDSAY CLANCY’S HUSBAND COULD TESTIFY FOR HER AT TRIAL OVER DEATHS OF THEIR THREE CHILDREN
“It wouldn’t be terribly surprising, no,” Patrick said.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani said the questioning appeared designed to prevent the defense from controlling how jurors view the cocktail of medications that Lindsay Clancy was prescribed in the months before authorities say she strangled Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE
“An important part of being a good prosecutor is not just proving your case, but anticipating the defense’s arguments,” Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Fox News Digital. “The prosecution wants to get out ahead of that potentially bad evidence by arguing that even though she was prescribed all these meds, she wasn’t prescribed them at the same time. At most, she was prescribed two, three, maybe four medications at once and, importantly, she wasn’t taking them.”
WATCH: Former prosecutor explains why pill bottles may become key evidence in Lindsay Clancy trial
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
Rahmani said prosecutors appeared to be getting ahead of the defense’s claim that Lindsay’s changing prescriptions contributed to her alleged psychosis.
“The last thing you want is the defense to gain control of the key piece of evidence,” he said. “It can be O.J.’s glove or a bag of pills.”
Rahmani said the next phase will likely focus on how long Lindsay took each medication, when she stopped taking it and how many drugs she was prescribed at once.
“It’s not uncommon for psychiatrists to try different medications and stop them when they stop working,” he said. “So how long was she on the Zoloft versus the Ativan versus the Seroquel? How many pills was she taking? I think the prosecution is gonna argue that Lindsay and her doctors were trying to get her better, and the fact that she wasn’t on all these pills at once really shows that the defense is trying to mislead the jury.”
The defense has argued that Lindsay was suffering from psychosis and was not criminally responsible when she strangled her three young children. Prosecutors, meanwhile, framed the mom of three as a calculated killer, saying that Clancy’s children were “deliberately and meticulously killed.”
LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST
Buckingham alleged that Clancy deliberately sent Patrick from their Duxbury home to pick up medication and takeout food, giving herself enough time to strangle each child with an exercise band before attempting to kill herself.
During opening statements, defense attorney Kevin Reddington conceded that Clancy killed the children but argued that the only meaningful dispute is what was happening inside her mind.
“She knows that she killed these children,” Reddington told jurors. “The issue for consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.”
Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital, has pleaded not guilty to three counts each of murder and strangulation.
SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS
Judge William Sullivan told jurors that the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible when the children were killed.
